FairPath + Buffaly
Practices use FairPath to bring remote care in-house.
Pharmacy operators use it to build new service lines with clinics they already know.
FairPath organizes the core program workflow. Buffaly handles repeatable administrative work, connects the systems already in use, and builds custom workflows that would otherwise require more staff or more vendors.
No revenue share. Your organization keeps 100% of program collections.
Historical FairPath and operator figures, not projections. Open the methodology for definitions and deployment context.
Owner input required: confirm the final source definitions and deployment context for the published scale figures before production publication.
FairPath and Buffaly connect through standard integrations, data exchange, APIs, and customer-specific workflows. The method depends on the system and deployment. Discuss My Environment
Most choices force one of three compromises: give up part of the economics, buy software and assemble the operation yourself, or wait for a generic roadmap to catch up with the business you are trying to build. FairPath and Buffaly use a different arrangement.
| What you need | What FairPath + Buffaly does | What changes for you |
|---|---|---|
| Keep more of the revenue | FairPath takes no percentage of collections. Your team owns the program; FairPath organizes it and Buffaly handles repeatable administrative and system work. | More of the value remains inside your business. |
| Run it without building a back office | FairPath routes daily work and keeps requirements visible. Buffaly moves data, handles configured repeatable steps, and routes exceptions. | Patient volume can grow without administrative headcount growing at the same rate. |
| Get real help without giving up the business | We train the team, help launch the first cohort, and remain involved when a workflow breaks or needs to change. | Your staff learns the operation while the relationships, knowledge, data, and margin remain yours. |
| Change the system as the business grows | We can add integrations, reports, portals, automations, and custom software around the way you actually operate. | You are not waiting for a generic product roadmap to decide whether the business can grow. |
| Use AI for actual work | Buffaly moves data, runs bounded workflows, routes exceptions, and builds missing tools. | AI reduces labor, handoffs, execution time, and vendor dependence rather than merely generating text. |
| Build beyond remote care | Use the same operating layer to attract demand, capture intake, run services, connect systems, and launch the next revenue line. | Remote care becomes the first capability, not the ceiling of the relationship. |
| Reduce vendor sprawl | One accountable relationship can cover platform, implementation, integration, automation, and custom work. | Fewer handoffs, less duplicated spend, and clearer accountability. |
FairPath is built for organizations that want the convenience of a serious operating partner without giving up the business they are building.
No revenue share. You retain program collections and decide the commercial model.
Patient, clinic, referral, and partner relationships stay with your organization.
Exports, APIs, and documented transition procedures keep the operating record accessible.
Private or customer-controlled deployment models are available. Rights in custom work are defined before development begins.
Deployment, portability, API access, and rights in custom work depend on the selected engagement. The final terms are documented before implementation begins.
Practices
Run APCM, RPM, CCM, and RTM around the patients, staff, and billing relationships you already have. FairPath puts the work in front of the right person; Buffaly handles repeatable work around it.
Pharmacy operators
Start with one clinic and use existing pharmacy capability, FairPath, and hands-on enablement to build a new healthcare revenue line.
Active remote-care operations
FairPath actively tracks requirements, readiness, and exceptions while your team owns and performs the work.
| Operational stage | Manual oversight | Active management with FairPath |
|---|---|---|
| Patient selection | Hunt and peck. Staff search static lists and charts to decide what matters next. | Prioritized work. Program fit, deadlines, and clinical risk bring the next patient forward. |
| Eligibility | Silent drift. Coverage changes may surface after work is completed. | In-cycle validation. Changes and missing requirements are flagged before more time is committed. |
| Daily routing | Search tax. Staff navigate lists between tasks and managers redistribute work manually. | PriorityQ and ReviewQ. Role-based queues route routine work and clinical exceptions. |
| Evidence capture | Reconstructed notes. Time and detail depend on separate follow-up documentation. | Evidence with the work. Calls, texts, and documentation produce timestamped records. |
| Billing readiness | Month-end cleanup. Teams discover incomplete work during reconciliation. | BillingQ visibility. Ready and blocked work remains visible with the reason for each exception. |
| Multi-program scale | Tool and manager sprawl. Each program adds screens, rules, and supervision. | One operating spine. APCM, RPM, CCM, and RTM share patient, queue, timing, and review workflows. |
What FairPath actually does
One operating platform supports APCM, RPM, CCM, and RTM across the work your team performs every day.
Use patient qualification scoring, payer and ERA intelligence, eligibility rules, and program mapping to identify where a service fits before staff time is committed.
Move onboarding out of spreadsheets with browser-based calling, scripts, consent capture, training, and device logistics where a program requires them.
PriorityQ and ReviewQ sort routine work and clinical exceptions by urgency, program status, risk, and completion requirements. Calls and texts start from the queue and attach to the patient record.
BillingQ applies configured program requirements, time thresholds, and cross-program rules so teams can see which work is ready and why other work remains blocked.
Structured care plans, evidence-based pathways, patient communication, and call transcription give clinicians one place to review the work that needs judgment.
Buffaly carries repeatable administrative and technical work around FairPath. Your team keeps control of decisions that require judgment while Buffaly moves information, coordinates systems, and builds the tools the work requires.
Create qualified demand around the healthcare services you operate.
Turn requests and interest into structured next actions.
Support repeatable administrative work around FairPath.
Coordinate the systems the operation already depends on.
Add the capability the next operating step requires.
A patient submits the request through the pharmacy website. Buffaly checks that the required information is present, routes the request to the correct employee, updates the configured record, and flags anything that needs human review.
Human control: pharmacy staff make identity, clinical, legal, and fulfillment decisions. Buffaly makes sure the request is complete, visible, and assigned.
Measured operating impact
These deployment examples describe the operating change behind each result. Outcomes vary by starting workflow, patient volume, program mix, staffing, and execution.
Starting problem: Manual insurance verification required payer-portal work that took approximately 45 minutes per patient.
Operating change: FairPath eligibility checks reduced the workflow to under five minutes, allowing one intake specialist to process the volume previously requiring substantially more manual capacity while reducing downstream denial risk.
Starting problem: Time was spent on patients already capped on billing units while other work stopped short of a threshold.
Operating change: Priority logic brought the most important patients and incomplete thresholds forward, reducing wasted blocks without removing clinical review.
Starting problem: Nurses spent approximately 90 seconds between tasks navigating lists to determine who to call next.
Operating change: PriorityQ served the next patient and task directly, returning time that had been lost to searching and sorting. The exact capacity gain depends on shift volume and workflow.
Start with one real operation
Map your patient panel, programs, staffing, and current operating model.
Build My Practice PlanSee the pharmacy operating model and the steps for launching with one clinic relationship.
Show Me the MoneyShow us the repetitive, technical, or cross-system work holding the operation back.
Talk Through a WorkflowPractical program resources