RPM Manual
The practical 2026 guide to device rules, day thresholds, management time, and audit defensibility for Remote Patient Monitoring.
Read the RPM Guide →Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) codes 99453, 99454, 99457, and 99458 are designed to be paid separately under Medicare’s fee-for-service schedule.
However, under capitated arrangements or managed-care contracts (including many Medicare Advantage plans), those same services are often treated as part of the global payment you already receive.
This page explains why you see CO-24 denials (“charges covered under a capitation agreement or managed care plan”) and what practical options you have when RPM isn’t separately reimbursable.
Coverage Models
Not all managed-care contracts are identical. Some plans carve out specific services from capitation. Historically, RPM is rarely carved out by default, but you should always check your contract.
Note on RHCs/FQHCs: As of 2024, CMS allows RHCs/FQHCs to bill RPM/RTM via G0511 (General Care Management), effectively carving it out of their all-inclusive rate.
Optimization
Avoid wasted effort and unnecessary denials by following these operational rules.
Confirm if you are the capitated primary entity. If you bill Medicare FFS for an MA member, expect a denial directing you to the plan.
Check your provider manual for "carve-outs." If the contract is silent, assume RPM is bundled into the PMPM payment.
If a plan always denies 99454 as CO-24, stop submitting the claim. Continue to document internally for quality/risk, but save the administrative labor.
RPM is a care-management service, not telehealth. Do not use telehealth modifiers unless the plan specifically demands them.
Ask provider relations directly: "Are RPM codes 99453–99458 payable outside of capitation?" A written policy excerpt is worth more than hours of phone appeals.
A CO-24 denial isn't usually a coding error; it's a contract signal. It means "We already paid you for this via capitation."
Use appeals only to correct routing errors. Use contract negotiations for true capitation issues.
If you sent an MA patient's claim to Original Medicare, CO-24 is their way of saying "Not our patient." Resubmit to the plan.
If you are a specialist and NOT the capitated primary provider, you may have grounds to appeal. The capitation might belong to the PCP, not you.
If denials are contractually correct, don't waste staff time on appeals. Pivot to alternative codes or PMPM renegotiation.
If RPM is bundled, look to other care management codes that might still be open.
Codes like 99490 are often separately payable even in capitated contracts. Medicare allows concurrent billing of RPM and CCM if minutes are distinct.
For post-discharge patients, 99495/99496 yields higher reimbursement and is less likely to be bundled than RPM.
Focused on a single complex condition (e.g., Heart Failure). Use 99424/99425 for intensive management of one issue.
Use your RPM data (BP control, reduced admissions) to negotiate higher capitation rates or shared savings bonuses. The ROI may be in the contract, not the claim.
FairPath is built on operational work, not theory. We publish the playbooks and checklists we use to keep programs compliant and profitable. Use them whether you run FairPath or not.
Browse the Expert Library →The practical 2026 guide to device rules, day thresholds, management time, and audit defensibility for Remote Patient Monitoring.
Read the RPM Guide →How to run Remote Therapeutic Monitoring for MSK, respiratory, and CBT workflows with the correct 9897x and 9898x rules.
Read the RTM Guide →Calendar-month operations for CCM: consent, initiating visit, care plan requirements, time counting, and concurrency rules.
Read the CCM Guide →The operator blueprint for Advanced Primary Care Management: eligibility, G0556–G0558 tiers, and monthly execution.
Read the APCM Playbook →