RPM Manual
The practical 2026 guide to device rules, day thresholds, management time, and audit defensibility for Remote Patient Monitoring.
Read the RPM Guide →This page provides a simple breakdown of what it means, why it’s a risk, and the stable alternative.
This new rule is another example of why building your entire care management program on RPM is a high-risk gamble. When RPM rates are volatile, the smart move is to build a foundation on stable, predictable revenue.
FairPath's platform lets you pivot, not panic.
For years, Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) rates were set using data from office-based practices. Starting in 2026, CMS will now use auditable cost data from Hospital Outpatient Departments (OPPS) to set the rates for some PFS technical services, explicitly including remote patient monitoring.
Here is the practical implication: Your practice's RPM reimbursements are now tied to a complex, lagging dataset you can't see or control.
This isn't just a "hospital issue" anymore. It's a direct threat to the financial stability of your remote monitoring program.
For clinicians, revenue-cycle leaders, and digital-health teams, here is the technical explanation of the system that now influences your RPM rates.
Medicare pays hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) under the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS). Services are grouped into Ambulatory Payment Classifications (APCs); each APC has a relative weight that, multiplied by a conversion factor, yields the payment rate.
OPPS does not use hospitals’ list charges as payment. CMS converts charges on claims to estimated costs using cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs) derived from hospital cost reports (HCRIS). CMS turns what hospitals billed into what it believes the service actually cost, and pays accordingly.
A quick example: if a claim line shows $1,000 in charges and the applicable CCR is 0.30, the estimated cost is $300. Thousands of such costed lines roll up into the geometric mean for the APC, which becomes the basis for the weight.
Each year CMS sets rates using the latest available data, which always lags. For CY 2026, for example, CMS proposed using CY 2024 claims with CY 2023 HCRIS cost reports. This rolling window means payment rates are always reflecting practice patterns from 1-2 years ago.
Don't let your practice's revenue be a victim of complex, changing rules.
This new rule is another example of why building your entire care management program on RPM is a high-risk gamble. When RPM rates are volatile, the smart move is to build a foundation on stable, predictable revenue.
FairPath's platform lets you pivot, not panic.
FairPath is built on operational work, not theory. We publish the playbooks and checklists we use to keep programs compliant and profitable. Use them whether you run FairPath or not.
Browse the Expert Library →The practical 2026 guide to device rules, day thresholds, management time, and audit defensibility for Remote Patient Monitoring.
Read the RPM Guide →How to run Remote Therapeutic Monitoring for MSK, respiratory, and CBT workflows with the correct 9897x and 9898x rules.
Read the RTM Guide →Calendar-month operations for CCM: consent, initiating visit, care plan requirements, time counting, and concurrency rules.
Read the CCM Guide →The operator blueprint for Advanced Primary Care Management: eligibility, G0556–G0558 tiers, and monthly execution.
Read the APCM Playbook →